TC Test with SUBKTEMP control
OBSID 0x00002068, 2009-06-11 (Commissioning Phase)
1. Test Basics
Data were downloaded from ops_1@chesterfield
on 2009 Jun 13 with
the export
utility from HIPE (BUILDNUM 229). Converted format
was selected.
- bias voltages in NHK: 31.1, 31.3, 31.4, 127.6 mV (PSW, PMW, PLW, PTC)
- bias frequency in NHK: 131.1 Hz
- phases in NHK: 180.7, 180.7, 180.7, 180.7 deg (PSW, PMW, PLW, PTC) -- different settings from PTC headroom tests earlier in commissioning phase
Here is the test record in Word format.
2. Data Processing
Not much more than adding PHOTOFF/PHOTOFFxxx in to the PHOT/PHOTFARRAYxxx,
using PHOT/TIME and PHOTOFF/TIME to time coordinate.
3. Results
- 00002068a.pdf, first part of test starting at
11:58 UT; "HCSPTCTE_50976753_0002.IPF" control starts at ~800 seconds
- 00002068b.pdf, second part of test starting at
13:17 UT; "HCSPTCTE_50976753_0003.IPF" control starts at ~1000 seconds;
"HCSPTCTE_50976753_0004.IPF" control starts at ~2000 seconds;
"HCSPTCTE_50976753_0005.IPF" control starts at ~4100 seconds
Here is a summary of key parameters for the various settings:
- HCSPTCTE_50976753_0002.IPF:
- set point: *change* of -150 ADU
- Kp = 30.0
- Ki = 0.8
- Kd = 0.0025
- low-pass filter gain, b1, b2: 1.565, -1.143, -0.413
- HCSPTCTE_50976753_0003.IPF:
- set point: *change* of 0 ADU
- otherwise same as HCSPTCTE_50976753_0002
- HCSPTCTE_50976753_0004.IPF:
- set point: *change* of 0 ADU
- low-pass filter gain, b1, b2: 74.855, 1.647, -0.701
- otherwise same as HCSPTCTE_50976753_0002
- HCSPTCTE_50976753_0005.IPF:
- set point: *change* of 0 ADU
- Kp = 7.5
- Ki = 0.2
- otherwise same as HCSPTCTE_50976753_0002
4. Conclusions
- All control settings in this test are stable against runaway. However,
the low pass filter test "0004" showed some oscillation.
- L0 temperature drift (approx. 0.5 mK) dominates the "a" part of this test.
While SUBKTEMP is stable, the other temperatures drift in a manner consistent
with increased power on the BDAs.
- For the "b" part of the test, the cause of the slight warmer drift in the
BDAs is not clear.
- Once the integral term has built up to the proper value, stopping and
restarting control stabilizes quickly -- except when Ki is changed.
- The nominal control parameters ("0002"):
- stabilize SUBKTEMP in approximately 250 sec.
- but inject noise into the PTC thermometers which is about 10 times
greater than with control off.
- Test "0004" (change in low pass filter):
- induced ~5 sec oscillation in control, visible in PTC thermometers
and TCHTR.
- (can't judge stabilization time)
- Test "0005" (lower Kp and Ki):
- stabilizes SUBKTEMP in as little as 250 sec (but perhaps more in a fair
comparison)
- substantially reduces the injected noise in the PTC thermometers,
now about 3 times the noise with control off.
- Note how cosmic-ray-free the PTC thermistors are.
- There are at least two PTC thermometer signal levels jumps in these data,
cause unknown:
- PTC-3, 11:54 UT, before my plots
- PTC-2, 12:01 UT, 200 sec. into "a" plot
- PTC-2, 12:04 UT, 350 sec. into "a" plot -- large
- PTC-2, 13:22 UT, 300 sec. into "b" plot
CDD, 2009 Jun 15